Aeonav vs Analyze
Aeonav is an open-source, self-hostable alternative to Analyze, an AI visibility tracking tool. Both measure how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Aeonav ships every line of code, runs on your own infrastructure, and is free to self-host — so your data stays yours and each metric is independently verifiable.
The short version
Analyze doesn't list Google AI Overviews among its engines and has no API. Aeonav has all of that, and it's free to self-host.
Aeonav
Open-source AEO platform. Self-host for free, forever. Track AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews with full transparency.
Analyze
AI search console covering discovery, monitoring, content, and reputation risk
About Analyze
Analyze organizes AI search work into four views: where a brand appears across answer engines and which sources models rely on, rankings and visibility share by topic or competitor, content fixes for pages invisible to both AI and search, and a governance view that monitors risk terms and reputational drift. Reporting covers brand ranking per engine and the top cited domains behind each answer.
Popularity grade: C
- Governance view monitors risk terms and negative narrative drift
- Positions against the category's own hype — argues the panic is profitable for vendors
- Per-engine breakdown of where the brand is cited and where it is absent
Feature comparison
| Feature | Aeonav | Analyze |
|---|---|---|
| Core Tracking | ||
| Multi-LLM Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| AI Visibility Score | Yes | Yes |
| Citation Analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Competitor Benchmarking | Yes | Yes |
| Brand Mention Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| AI Engines | ||
| ChatGPT | Yes | Yes |
| Google AI Overviews | Yes | No |
| Google AI Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Gemini | Yes | Yes |
| Perplexity | Yes | Yes |
| Microsoft Copilot | Yes | Yes |
| Claude | Yes | Yes |
| Grok | Yes | Yes |
| DeepSeek | Yes | Yes |
| Meta AI | Yes | No |
| Any Model | Yes | No |
| Real UI Answers | Yes | No |
| Bring Your Own Keys | Yes | No |
| Platform | ||
| White-Label / Agency | Yes | No |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Content Generation | No | Yes |
| Advanced Analytics | ||
| Prompt Volume Estimates | No | No |
| Sentiment Analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Query Fan-Out | Yes | No |
| AI Crawler Analytics | No | No |
| Geographic Tracking | No | No |
| Social Media Tracking | No | No |
| Shopping Tracking | No | No |
| Multi-Language | No | No |
| Actionable Insights | ||
| Action Recommendations | Yes | Yes |
| Content Gap Analysis | Yes | Yes |
| AI Site Audits | No | Yes |
| AI Keyword Research | Yes | Yes |
| Reporting & Integration | ||
| Email Alerts | No | No |
| API Access | Yes | No |
| TypeScript SDK | Yes | No |
| Python SDK | Yes | No |
| MCP Access | Yes | Yes |
| BI Connectors | No | No |
We last checked Analyze against its own site in Oct 2026. Spot an error? Suggest a correction or edit the data on GitHub.
Key differences
Only in Aeonav
- Google AI Overviews
- Meta AI
- Any Model
- Real UI Answers
- Bring Your Own Keys
- White-Label / Agency
- Open Source
- Query Fan-Out
- API Access
- TypeScript SDK
- Python SDK
Both offer
- Multi-LLM Tracking
- AI Visibility Score
- Citation Analytics
- Competitor Benchmarking
- Brand Mention Tracking
- ChatGPT
- Google AI Mode
- Gemini
- Perplexity
- Microsoft Copilot
- Claude
- Grok
- DeepSeek
- Sentiment Analysis
- Action Recommendations
- Content Gap Analysis
- AI Keyword Research
- MCP Access
Only in Analyze
- Content Generation
- AI Site Audits
Why choose Aeonav over Analyze?
Open source and transparent
Every line of code is open. You can verify exactly how your visibility data is collected, calculated, and presented. No black boxes.
Self-host for free, forever
Run Aeonav on your own infrastructure. The core platform is free and always will be, and Aeonav Cloud is there if you would rather not run it yourself.
Your data, in your stack
Pull every metric, sentiment included, into your own code with the REST API and TypeScript and Python SDKs, or ask Claude Code and Cursor about it over MCP. Export, fork, or migrate at any time.
Built to last
Bootstrapped and sustainable. No investors pushing towards dark patterns. We'll outlast the companies taking too much VC money.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is the difference between Aeonav and Analyze?
- Aeonav is an open-source, self-hostable AI visibility platform, while Analyze is a closed-source AI visibility tracking tool. Both track how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Aeonav gives you the full source code and runs on your own infrastructure, so you can verify every metric and keep your data in-house.
- Is Aeonav a free, open-source alternative to Analyze?
- Yes. Aeonav is a free, open-source alternative to Analyze. You can self-host the full platform at no cost, read every line of code, and track your AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews without per-seat or per-prompt fees.
- Is Analyze open source?
- No, Analyze is a hosted product without public source code. Aeonav is fully open source, so you can read how each metric is calculated, self-host it on your own infrastructure, and take your data with you.
- How do Aeonav and Analyze compare on sentiment analysis, API access, and MCP?
- Aeonav includes all three: a 0 to 100 sentiment score for every AI answer that mentions you, a REST API with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and an MCP server so assistants like Claude Code and Cursor can query your data. Analyze offers sentiment analysis and an MCP server, but we have not found it offering API access.
- Can I self-host Aeonav instead of Analyze?
- Yes. Aeonav is designed to be self-hosted — deploy it on your own infrastructure in minutes with the CLI. You keep full ownership of your data and prompts, with no per-seat pricing and no third-party dashboard holding your visibility history.
Ready to track your AI visibility?
Deploy Aeonav in minutes and start monitoring how ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews talk about your brand.