--- title: Aeonav vs Hall | AI Visibility Tool Comparison · Aeonav description: Compare Aeonav and Hall for AI visibility tracking. Feature-by-feature breakdown, pricing, and key differences. canonical: https://www.aeonav.fivecoder.com/ai-visibility-tools/elmo-vs-hall updated: "2026-10-20" --- [AI Visibility Tool Directory](http://www.aeonav.fivecoder.com/ai-visibility-tools) # Aeonav vs Hall Aeonav is an open-source, self-hostable alternative to Hall, an AI visibility tracking tool. Both measure how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Aeonav ships every line of code, runs on your own infrastructure, and is free to self-host — so your data stays yours and each metric is independently verifiable. The short version Hall is gone as a standalone product. Acquired by Tracksuit; new signups go to Tracksuit's waitlist. Aeonav is MIT-licensed, so you keep the code and your data no matter what. Hall has been acquired (Jul 21, 2026) Acquired by Tracksuit; new signups go to Tracksuit's waitlist. [See the AEO Graveyard](http://www.aeonav.fivecoder.com/ai-visibility-tools/graveyard) for what to do next. ## Aeonav Open SourceSelf-HostedWhite-Label Open-source AEO platform. Self-host for free, forever. Track AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews with full transparency. ## Hall AI Visibility Tracking AI brand visibility tracker, acquired by Tracksuit ## Hall at a glance ![Screenshot of Hall homepage](https://nynjceth7hnajxhe.public.blob.vercel-storage.com/screenshots/hall.jpg) [Visit usehall.com](https://usehall.com/) ## About Hall Hall tracked how brands appeared in AI conversations, measuring sentiment, share of voice, and positioning. It was acquired by brand-tracking company Tracksuit in July 2026, on the stated reasoning that a mention score means little without knowing what real people think, so LLM brand health should sit alongside human brand health rather than in a separate tool. Existing users can still log in; new signups go to a waitlist. Popularity grade: C - Acquired by Tracksuit in July 2026; new signups are waitlisted - Merging LLM brand health with human brand-tracking survey data - Its own postmortem argues an AI mention score is meaningless in isolation ## Feature comparison | Feature | Aeonav | Hall | | ----------------------- | ------ | ---- | | Core Tracking | | | | Multi-LLM Tracking | Yes | Yes | | AI Visibility Score | Yes | Yes | | Citation Analytics | Yes | Yes | | Competitor Benchmarking | Yes | Yes | | Brand Mention Tracking | Yes | Yes | | AI Engines | | | | ChatGPT | Yes | No | | Google AI Overviews | Yes | No | | Google AI Mode | Yes | No | | Gemini | Yes | No | | Perplexity | Yes | No | | Microsoft Copilot | Yes | No | | Claude | Yes | No | | Grok | Yes | No | | DeepSeek | Yes | No | | Meta AI | Yes | No | | Any Model | Yes | No | | Real UI Answers | Yes | No | | Bring Your Own Keys | Yes | No | | Platform | | | | White-Label / Agency | Yes | No | | Open Source | Yes | No | | Content Generation | No | No | | Advanced Analytics | | | | Prompt Volume Estimates | No | No | | Sentiment Analysis | Yes | Yes | | Query Fan-Out | Yes | No | | AI Crawler Analytics | No | No | | Geographic Tracking | No | No | | Social Media Tracking | No | No | | Shopping Tracking | No | No | | Multi-Language | No | No | | Actionable Insights | | | | Action Recommendations | Yes | No | | Content Gap Analysis | Yes | No | | AI Site Audits | No | No | | AI Keyword Research | Yes | No | | Reporting & Integration | | | | Email Alerts | No | No | | API Access | Yes | No | | TypeScript SDK | Yes | No | | Python SDK | Yes | No | | MCP Access | Yes | No | | BI Connectors | No | No | We last checked Hall against its own site in Oct 2026. Spot an error? [Suggest a correction](https://github.com/orbitrepos/aeonav/issues/new?title=Correction+for+Hall\&body=What%27s+wrong%2C+and+where+can+we+see+the+correct+information+%28a+pricing+page%2C+docs%2C+or+changelog%29%3F%0A%0A) or [edit the data on GitHub](https://github.com/orbitrepos/aeonav/blob/main/apps/www/src/lib/competitors/data.ts). ## Key differences ### Only in Aeonav - ChatGPT - Google AI Overviews - Google AI Mode - Gemini - Perplexity - Microsoft Copilot - Claude - Grok - DeepSeek - Meta AI - Any Model - Real UI Answers - Bring Your Own Keys - White-Label / Agency - Open Source - Query Fan-Out - Action Recommendations - Content Gap Analysis - AI Keyword Research - API Access - TypeScript SDK - Python SDK - MCP Access ### Both offer - Multi-LLM Tracking - AI Visibility Score - Citation Analytics - Competitor Benchmarking - Brand Mention Tracking - Sentiment Analysis ## Why choose Aeonav over Hall? ### Open source and transparent Every line of code is open. You can verify exactly how your visibility data is collected, calculated, and presented. No black boxes. ### Self-host for free, forever Run Aeonav on your own infrastructure. The core platform is free and always will be, and Aeonav Cloud is there if you would rather not run it yourself. ### Your data, in your stack Pull every metric, sentiment included, into your own code with the REST API and TypeScript and Python SDKs, or ask Claude Code and Cursor about it over MCP. Export, fork, or migrate at any time. ### Built to last Bootstrapped and sustainable. No investors pushing towards dark patterns. We'll outlast the companies taking too much VC money. ## Frequently Asked Questions - What is the difference between Aeonav and Hall? Aeonav is an open-source, self-hostable AI visibility platform, while Hall is a closed-source AI visibility tracking tool. Both track how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Aeonav gives you the full source code and runs on your own infrastructure, so you can verify every metric and keep your data in-house. - Is Aeonav a free, open-source alternative to Hall? Yes. Aeonav is a free, open-source alternative to Hall. You can self-host the full platform at no cost, read every line of code, and track your AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews without per-seat or per-prompt fees. - Is Hall open source? No, Hall is a hosted product without public source code. Aeonav is fully open source, so you can read how each metric is calculated, self-host it on your own infrastructure, and take your data with you. - How do Aeonav and Hall compare on sentiment analysis, API access, and MCP? Aeonav includes all three: a 0 to 100 sentiment score for every AI answer that mentions you, a REST API with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and an MCP server so assistants like Claude Code and Cursor can query your data. Hall offers sentiment analysis, but we have not found it offering API access or an MCP server. - Can I self-host Aeonav instead of Hall? Yes. Aeonav is designed to be self-hosted — deploy it on your own infrastructure in minutes with the CLI. You keep full ownership of your data and prompts, with no per-seat pricing and no third-party dashboard holding your visibility history. ## Ready to track your AI visibility? Deploy Aeonav in minutes and start monitoring how ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews talk about your brand. [Deploy Aeonav](http://www.aeonav.fivecoder.com/docs/getting-started)[View on GitHub](https://github.com/orbitrepos/aeonav)