---
title: Aeonav vs GeoLook | AI Visibility Tool Comparison · Aeonav
description: Compare Aeonav and GeoLook for AI visibility tracking. Feature-by-feature breakdown, pricing, and key differences.
canonical: https://www.aeonav.fivecoder.com/ai-visibility-tools/elmo-vs-geolook
updated: "2026-10-20"
---

[AI Visibility Tool Directory](http://www.aeonav.fivecoder.com/ai-visibility-tools)

# Aeonav vs GeoLook

Aeonav and GeoLook are both open-source AI visibility tools you can self-host and audit. Aeonav's focus is transparent, independently verifiable tracking across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews — with white-label support for agencies and a documented methodology behind every number.

The short version

GeoLook doesn't list Google AI Mode, Claude, or Microsoft Copilot among its engines and has no API or MCP server. Aeonav has all of that, and it's free to self-host.

GeoLook appears to be a very early-stage product with limited adoption.

## Aeonav

Open SourceSelf-HostedWhite-Label

Open-source AEO platform. Self-host for free, forever. Track AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews with full transparency.

## GeoLook

Open SourceFree Tier

Self-hosted GEO implementation workbench covering monitoring, diagnosis and verification

## GeoLook at a glance

![Screenshot of GeoLook homepage](https://nynjceth7hnajxhe.public.blob.vercel-storage.com/screenshots/geolook.jpg)

[Visit geolook.cc](https://geolook.cc/)

## About GeoLook

GeoLook samples answers across up to 17 engines (10 via API, 7 via a manual/Chrome-extension sampling flow) to measure mention rate, rank and citation share, then runs site audits and generates implementation tickets whose results are re-verified in later sampling rounds. It is aimed at both Chinese and global engines and at agencies delivering GEO work.

Popularity grade: F

- MIT-licensed and self-host only
- Covers Chinese and global engines, some sampled by hand through a Chrome extension
- Generates implementation tickets and re-verifies them in later runs

## Feature comparison

| Feature                 | Aeonav | GeoLook |
| ----------------------- | ------ | ------- |
| Core Tracking           |        |         |
| Multi-LLM Tracking      | Yes    | Yes     |
| AI Visibility Score     | Yes    | Yes     |
| Citation Analytics      | Yes    | Yes     |
| Competitor Benchmarking | Yes    | Yes     |
| Brand Mention Tracking  | Yes    | Yes     |
| AI Engines              |        |         |
| ChatGPT                 | Yes    | Yes     |
| Google AI Overviews     | Yes    | Yes     |
| Google AI Mode          | Yes    | No      |
| Gemini                  | Yes    | Yes     |
| Perplexity              | Yes    | Yes     |
| Microsoft Copilot       | Yes    | No      |
| Claude                  | Yes    | No      |
| Grok                    | Yes    | No      |
| DeepSeek                | Yes    | Yes     |
| Meta AI                 | Yes    | No      |
| Any Model               | Yes    | No      |
| Real UI Answers         | Yes    | No      |
| Bring Your Own Keys     | Yes    | Yes     |
| Platform                |        |         |
| White-Label / Agency    | Yes    | Yes     |
| Open Source             | Yes    | Yes     |
| Content Generation      | No     | Yes     |
| Advanced Analytics      |        |         |
| Prompt Volume Estimates | No     | No      |
| Sentiment Analysis      | Yes    | No      |
| Query Fan-Out           | Yes    | No      |
| AI Crawler Analytics    | No     | No      |
| Geographic Tracking     | No     | No      |
| Social Media Tracking   | No     | No      |
| Shopping Tracking       | No     | No      |
| Multi-Language          | No     | Yes     |
| Actionable Insights     |        |         |
| Action Recommendations  | Yes    | Yes     |
| Content Gap Analysis    | Yes    | Yes     |
| AI Site Audits          | No     | Yes     |
| AI Keyword Research     | Yes    | Yes     |
| Reporting & Integration |        |         |
| Email Alerts            | No     | No      |
| API Access              | Yes    | No      |
| TypeScript SDK          | Yes    | No      |
| Python SDK              | Yes    | No      |
| MCP Access              | Yes    | No      |
| BI Connectors           | No     | No      |

We last checked GeoLook against its own site in Oct 2026. Spot an error? [Suggest a correction](https://github.com/orbitrepos/aeonav/issues/new?title=Correction+for+GeoLook\&body=What%27s+wrong%2C+and+where+can+we+see+the+correct+information+%28a+pricing+page%2C+docs%2C+or+changelog%29%3F%0A%0A) or [edit the data on GitHub](https://github.com/orbitrepos/aeonav/blob/main/apps/www/src/lib/competitors/data.ts).

## Key differences

### Only in Aeonav

- Google AI Mode
- Microsoft Copilot
- Claude
- Grok
- Meta AI
- Any Model
- Real UI Answers
- Sentiment Analysis
- Query Fan-Out
- API Access
- TypeScript SDK
- Python SDK
- MCP Access

### Both offer

- Multi-LLM Tracking
- AI Visibility Score
- Citation Analytics
- Competitor Benchmarking
- Brand Mention Tracking
- ChatGPT
- Google AI Overviews
- Gemini
- Perplexity
- DeepSeek
- Bring Your Own Keys
- White-Label / Agency
- Open Source
- Action Recommendations
- Content Gap Analysis
- AI Keyword Research

### Only in GeoLook

- Content Generation
- Multi-Language
- AI Site Audits

## Why choose Aeonav over GeoLook?

### Open source and transparent

Every line of code is open. You can verify exactly how your visibility data is collected, calculated, and presented. No black boxes.

### Self-host for free, forever

Run Aeonav on your own infrastructure. The core platform is free and always will be, and Aeonav Cloud is there if you would rather not run it yourself.

### Your data, in your stack

Pull every metric, sentiment included, into your own code with the REST API and TypeScript and Python SDKs, or ask Claude Code and Cursor about it over MCP. Export, fork, or migrate at any time.

### Built to last

Bootstrapped and sustainable. No investors pushing towards dark patterns. We'll outlast the companies taking too much VC money.

## Frequently Asked Questions

- What is the difference between Aeonav and GeoLook?

  Both Aeonav and GeoLook are open source, so you can self-host either one and inspect the code. Aeonav focuses specifically on transparent, independently verifiable AI visibility tracking across every major answer engine, with white-label support for agencies and a fully documented methodology behind each number.

- Is Aeonav a free, open-source alternative to GeoLook?

  Yes. Aeonav is a free, open-source alternative to GeoLook. You can self-host the full platform at no cost, read every line of code, and track your AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews without per-seat or per-prompt fees.

- Is GeoLook open source?

  Yes, GeoLook is open source. Aeonav is open source as well and is built specifically for self-hosted, independently verifiable AI visibility tracking, so you can audit exactly how each metric is calculated.

- How do Aeonav and GeoLook compare on sentiment analysis, API access, and MCP?

  Aeonav includes all three: a 0 to 100 sentiment score for every AI answer that mentions you, a REST API with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and an MCP server so assistants like Claude Code and Cursor can query your data. We have not found GeoLook offering sentiment analysis, API access, or an MCP server.

- Can I self-host Aeonav instead of GeoLook?

  Yes. Aeonav is designed to be self-hosted — deploy it on your own infrastructure in minutes with the CLI. You keep full ownership of your data and prompts, with no per-seat pricing and no third-party dashboard holding your visibility history.

## Ready to track your AI visibility?

Deploy Aeonav in minutes and start monitoring how ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews talk about your brand.

[Deploy Aeonav](http://www.aeonav.fivecoder.com/docs/getting-started)[View on GitHub](https://github.com/orbitrepos/aeonav)