--- title: Aeonav vs Azoma | AI Visibility Tool Comparison · Aeonav description: Compare Aeonav and Azoma for AI visibility tracking. Feature-by-feature breakdown, pricing, and key differences. canonical: https://www.aeonav.fivecoder.com/ai-visibility-tools/elmo-vs-azoma updated: "2026-10-20" --- [AI Visibility Tool Directory](http://www.aeonav.fivecoder.com/ai-visibility-tools) # Aeonav vs Azoma Aeonav is an open-source, self-hostable alternative to Azoma, an e-commerce tool. Both measure how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Aeonav ships every line of code, runs on your own infrastructure, and is free to self-host — so your data stays yours and each metric is independently verifiable. The short version Azoma doesn't list Google AI Overviews, Claude, or Microsoft Copilot among its engines and has no MCP server. Aeonav has all of that, and it's free to self-host. ## Aeonav Open SourceSelf-HostedWhite-Label Open-source AEO platform. Self-host for free, forever. Track AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews with full transparency. ## Azoma E-commerce Agentic commerce optimization measured in revenue rather than mentions ## Azoma at a glance ![Screenshot of Azoma homepage](https://nynjceth7hnajxhe.public.blob.vercel-storage.com/screenshots/azoma.jpg) [Visit azoma.ai](https://www.azoma.ai/) ## About Azoma Azoma targets enterprise retail and argues that generative engine optimization measures the wrong things: where GEO reports mentions, citations, and share of voice across LLM apps, Azoma reports revenue, conversion rate, and SKU-level discoverability across both LLM apps and retailer shopping agents — Amazon Rufus, Walmart Sparky, and Alexa for Shopping alongside ChatGPT, Gemini, Meta AI, and Claude. It supports the Agentic Merchant, Universal Commerce, and Agentic Commerce protocols, and sources tracked prompts from digital twin technology, public Q\&A, and marketplace data. Popularity grade: C - Tracks retailer shopping agents — Rufus, Sparky, Alexa — not just LLM apps - Reports SKU-level discoverability, conversion, and revenue instead of share of voice - Supports the Agentic Merchant, Universal Commerce, and Agentic Commerce protocols ## Feature comparison | Feature | Aeonav | Azoma | | ----------------------- | ------ | ----- | | Core Tracking | | | | Multi-LLM Tracking | Yes | Yes | | AI Visibility Score | Yes | Yes | | Citation Analytics | Yes | Yes | | Competitor Benchmarking | Yes | Yes | | Brand Mention Tracking | Yes | Yes | | AI Engines | | | | ChatGPT | Yes | Yes | | Google AI Overviews | Yes | No | | Google AI Mode | Yes | Yes | | Gemini | Yes | Yes | | Perplexity | Yes | Yes | | Microsoft Copilot | Yes | No | | Claude | Yes | No | | Grok | Yes | No | | DeepSeek | Yes | No | | Meta AI | Yes | No | | Any Model | Yes | No | | Real UI Answers | Yes | No | | Bring Your Own Keys | Yes | No | | Platform | | | | White-Label / Agency | Yes | No | | Open Source | Yes | No | | Content Generation | No | Yes | | Advanced Analytics | | | | Prompt Volume Estimates | No | No | | Sentiment Analysis | Yes | Yes | | Query Fan-Out | Yes | No | | AI Crawler Analytics | No | No | | Geographic Tracking | No | No | | Social Media Tracking | No | No | | Shopping Tracking | No | Yes | | Multi-Language | No | No | | Actionable Insights | | | | Action Recommendations | Yes | Yes | | Content Gap Analysis | Yes | Yes | | AI Site Audits | No | Yes | | AI Keyword Research | Yes | Yes | | Reporting & Integration | | | | Email Alerts | No | No | | API Access | Yes | Yes | | TypeScript SDK | Yes | No | | Python SDK | Yes | No | | MCP Access | Yes | No | | BI Connectors | No | No | We last checked Azoma against its own site in Oct 2026. Spot an error? [Suggest a correction](https://github.com/orbitrepos/aeonav/issues/new?title=Correction+for+Azoma\&body=What%27s+wrong%2C+and+where+can+we+see+the+correct+information+%28a+pricing+page%2C+docs%2C+or+changelog%29%3F%0A%0A) or [edit the data on GitHub](https://github.com/orbitrepos/aeonav/blob/main/apps/www/src/lib/competitors/data.ts). ## Key differences ### Only in Aeonav - Google AI Overviews - Microsoft Copilot - Claude - Grok - DeepSeek - Meta AI - Any Model - Real UI Answers - Bring Your Own Keys - White-Label / Agency - Open Source - Query Fan-Out - TypeScript SDK - Python SDK - MCP Access ### Both offer - Multi-LLM Tracking - AI Visibility Score - Citation Analytics - Competitor Benchmarking - Brand Mention Tracking - ChatGPT - Google AI Mode - Gemini - Perplexity - Sentiment Analysis - Action Recommendations - Content Gap Analysis - AI Keyword Research - API Access ### Only in Azoma - Content Generation - Shopping Tracking - AI Site Audits ## Why choose Aeonav over Azoma? ### Open source and transparent Every line of code is open. You can verify exactly how your visibility data is collected, calculated, and presented. No black boxes. ### Self-host for free, forever Run Aeonav on your own infrastructure. The core platform is free and always will be, and Aeonav Cloud is there if you would rather not run it yourself. ### Your data, in your stack Pull every metric, sentiment included, into your own code with the REST API and TypeScript and Python SDKs, or ask Claude Code and Cursor about it over MCP. Export, fork, or migrate at any time. ### Built to last Bootstrapped and sustainable. No investors pushing towards dark patterns. We'll outlast the companies taking too much VC money. ## Frequently Asked Questions - What is the difference between Aeonav and Azoma? Aeonav is an open-source, self-hostable AI visibility platform, while Azoma is a closed-source e-commerce tool. Both track how AI answer engines describe your brand, but Aeonav gives you the full source code and runs on your own infrastructure, so you can verify every metric and keep your data in-house. - Is Aeonav a free, open-source alternative to Azoma? Yes. Aeonav is a free, open-source alternative to Azoma. You can self-host the full platform at no cost, read every line of code, and track your AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews without per-seat or per-prompt fees. - Is Azoma open source? No, Azoma is a hosted product without public source code. Aeonav is fully open source, so you can read how each metric is calculated, self-host it on your own infrastructure, and take your data with you. - How do Aeonav and Azoma compare on sentiment analysis, API access, and MCP? Aeonav includes all three: a 0 to 100 sentiment score for every AI answer that mentions you, a REST API with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and an MCP server so assistants like Claude Code and Cursor can query your data. Azoma offers sentiment analysis and API access, but we have not found it offering an MCP server. - Can I self-host Aeonav instead of Azoma? Yes. Aeonav is designed to be self-hosted — deploy it on your own infrastructure in minutes with the CLI. You keep full ownership of your data and prompts, with no per-seat pricing and no third-party dashboard holding your visibility history. ## Ready to track your AI visibility? Deploy Aeonav in minutes and start monitoring how ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews talk about your brand. [Deploy Aeonav](http://www.aeonav.fivecoder.com/docs/getting-started)[View on GitHub](https://github.com/orbitrepos/aeonav)